1. Tech 1 and Tech 2 have different costs, and are good at targeting different species:
1.1. Species 1 grows faster and has lower value - Species 1 grows faster and has a higher carrying capacity
(r1 = 1, r2 = 0.5; K1 = 1.5, K2 = 1); - Cost of tech 1 is lower than tech 2
(C1 = 6, C2 = 10); - price of species 2 is higher than species 1
(p1 = 150, p2 = 400); - Tech 1 is good at catching species 1, tech 2 is good at catching species 2;
1.2. Species 1 grows faster and has higher value - Species 1 grows faster and has a higher carrying capacity
(r1 = 1, r2 = 0.5; K1 = 1.5, K2 = 1); - Cost of tech 1 is lower than tech 2
(C1 = 6, C2 = 10); - price of species 2 is higher than species 1
(p1 = 150, p2 = 400); - Tech 1 is good at catching species 1, tech 2 is good at catching species 2;
2. Tech 1 and Tech 2 have the same costs, but are good at targeting different species:
3. Tech 1 and Tech 2 have the same costs, but are good at targeting different species:
| species 1 | species 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| tech 1 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| tech 2 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| E1 | E2 | PVNB |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 7.5 | 425.1650 |
| 7.5 | 7.0 | 425.1650 |
| 6.5 | 8.0 | 425.1274 |
| 8.0 | 6.5 | 425.1274 |
| 7.5 | 7.5 | 425.1122 |
| 7.0 | 8.0 | 425.0941 |
| 8.0 | 7.0 | 425.0941 |
| 6.0 | 8.5 | 425.0522 |
| 8.5 | 6.0 | 425.0522 |
| 6.5 | 8.5 | 425.0398 |